It started
three days ago with a “Meet the Press” gaffe(?), quickly recanted, by Obama
supporter Newark Mayor Corey Booker labeling the attacks(?) as “nauseating.”
The question
marks are for skepticism about Booker’s motives. Those who remember Bill
Clinton’s “Sister Souljah moment” in 1992, as the Mayor surely must, can
testify to the selfish value of distancing oneself from ideological “extremism”
on your own side.
But when
and how did Romney’s Bain Capital claims become sacrosanct? How did what the
President says “this campaign is all about” become so toxic to him?
His
immediate answer to the Booker uproar was: “If your main argument for how to
grow the economy is, ‘I knew how to make a lot of money for investors,’ then
you are missing what this job is about.
“It
doesn’t mean you weren’t good at private equity. But that’s not what my job is
as president. My job is to take into account everybody, not just some...Their
priority is to maximize profits, and that’s not always going to be good for
businesses or communities or workers.”
Joe Biden followed up about Bain in his usual unvarnished way, observing that “companies
go under, everybody loses their job, the community is devastated but they make
money.”
Such reasonable
responses to Romney’s self-puffery have now morphed into attacks on Capitalism,
Motherhood and Apple Pie, putting gun-shy Democrats on the defensive. Their
reaction suggests a deeper anxiety.
That’s
the most troubling aspect of all this, the sense that it’s more anti-Obama than
pro-Romney, as the President struggles in primaries to hold his own against “Uncommitted.”
That
could be Mitt Romney’s middle name.
Meanwhile,
the President’s Press Secretary is suggesting that Barack Obama is more conservative than Herbert Hoover, citing “significant fiscal restraint” and a “balanced
approach” to spending. Can voters bear months more of topsy-turvy talk?
No comments:
Post a Comment