Suddenly the Obama White House is besieged by accusations of IRS targeting Tea Party groups and the Justice Department bugging the Associated Press just as the Benghazi talking points todo starts to lose steam.
The
White House is on the defensive in the dirty-pool competition, recalling the
scandals of Bush II’s final years--but with difference.
Disheartening
as these revelations may be and as complex in the AP matter involving an
imminent terror attack on American soil, they serve as reminders that
bureaucracies can blunder in the Internet Age and the President has to be
accountable for what they do.
But
as Boehner et al bluster and call for heads to roll, perspective requires
distinguishing between today’s furors about failed White House oversight and
the Bush scandals emanating directly from the top: the outing of Valerie Plame
by Cheney lapdog Scooter Libby and Karl Rove’s attempt, in concert with
Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, to fire Bush’s own US Attorneys for not
being zealous enough in prosecuting Democrats.
Even
so, the new Washington narrative encourages a mindless equivalence between the
two eras and undercuts any momentum the President may have been gathering in
getting Washington to function at least at a minimum in days dominated by
sequester and scandal.
Yet,
as the Obama people work to clean up their own messes, there should be some alternative
to turning away in disgust and saying, “To hell with them all.” The differences remain.
No comments:
Post a Comment