Below
these visible eruptions over race and even more important for the future is the
double-edged story of Barack Obama. Yes, we have elected and reelected an African-American
president, but how much of the hatred and bitterness directed at him comes, not
from his policies and persona, but his race?
Nearing
90, I can’t erase memories of racism when I was a young editor—-the murders of
Emmett Till, Medgar Evers and Andrew Goodman; Martin Luther King and the
Montgomery bus strike; the Supreme Court school desegregation of 1954; the
persistence of laws against interracial marriage until the 1960s; the steady
but very slow progress of integration in the North and South in the ensuing
decades.
Through
all of that, I was a journalist with strong feelings about what Dr. King called
the arc of the universe bending toward justice. And if we still argue today
about college quotas and the bizarre murder of a black teenager in Florida,
have we not nevertheless progressed from those benighted days?
Yes,
but...
Whatever
the outcomes of this week’s legal tests, the important issue that plagues
current generations is facing our true feelings about Barack Obama.
As
his adversaries, with the reflexive complicity of the media, fail to engage in “nuanced debate” over policy issues, real and trumped-up of his second term, do we do
ourselves any service by not asking: How much of the GOP vitriol and Tea Party
longing for the supposedly good old days is rooted in racism?
We have
come a long way from the days of separate-but-equal and lynching, but under the
surface of the polite legal arguments this week in courts high and low, how far
are we from those days in our hearts?
If we
don’t answer that now, we’ll keep paying a high price for our failure in the
future.
2 comments:
Amen to that, Mr. Stein.
As another old-time journalist would have said: And so it goes.
Not far at all in our hearts. But David Brooks in "Mutt Nation" shows the demographic tidal wave will sweep all before it, eventually.
Post a Comment