So
much for deep analysis but, with two weeks to go, will Barack Obama’s clear victory
on foreign affairs make the difference in a close election?
To
avoid gaffes, Romney resorted to head-nodding as a strategy and was rewarded
with Presidential lectures tinged with sarcasm.
“Every
time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong,” Obama told him. “Not only
were you wrong, but you were confusing in sending mixed messages to our troops
and to our allies.”
“Attacking
me is not an agenda,” Romney replied, hunkering down.
When
the GOP candidate dared point out the size of the U.S. Navy “is smaller now
than any time since 1917,” the Commander-in-Chief brought his rhetorical big
guns:
“Governor
Romney maybe hasn’t spent enough time looking at how our military works. You
mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in
1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature
of our military’s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where
planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear
submarines.”
Because
Romney was being so careful, the post-debate fact-checking this time is not as devastating
as usual for him, but leaving aside the question of whether Obama’s open
disdain may have turned off some undecided voters, the final debate was a rout
in the contest to appear presidential.
Two
weeks from today, the rest of us finally win relief from all this posturing and primping as we get
to kiss the 2012 campaign goodbye.
Update: A New York Times editorial blows off the puckering up: "Mitt Romney has nothing really coherent or substantive to say about domestic policy, but at least he can sound energetic and confident about it. On foreign policy, the subject of Monday night’s final presidential debate, he had little coherent to say and often sounded completely lost. That’s because he has no original ideas of substance on most world issues, including Syria, Iran and Afghanistan."
Joe Biden adds about Obama: "I was chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee; he was on my Foreign Relations Committee for four years. He demonstrated a grasp and a gravity. He had a worldview of where America’s position should be, how we should interact with the world, how we should rebuild alliances. Gov. Romney didn’t demonstrate any breadth of understanding.”
Update: A New York Times editorial blows off the puckering up: "Mitt Romney has nothing really coherent or substantive to say about domestic policy, but at least he can sound energetic and confident about it. On foreign policy, the subject of Monday night’s final presidential debate, he had little coherent to say and often sounded completely lost. That’s because he has no original ideas of substance on most world issues, including Syria, Iran and Afghanistan."
Joe Biden adds about Obama: "I was chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee; he was on my Foreign Relations Committee for four years. He demonstrated a grasp and a gravity. He had a worldview of where America’s position should be, how we should interact with the world, how we should rebuild alliances. Gov. Romney didn’t demonstrate any breadth of understanding.”
No comments:
Post a Comment