By
that definition, men who do things (like generals) rather than sell themselves (like
politicians) are disadvantaged in extracurricular sex. In light of current flirting
follies by military leaders, my own experiences recall sadly how little has changed
in over half a century.
In
1965 I became editor of the world’s largest women’s magazine, and my calendar
suddenly filled up with names from society pages—-ambitious young wives of
elderly politicians, middle-aged beauties who had married well and often,
dowager queens of the Social Register.
I was
being recruited for activities previously unknown to me. “Tell them,” my beautiful
well-grounded wife advised drily, “that up close you’re not that interesting.”
No
matter. At a Washington restaurant, I ran into Perle Mesta, the fabled
political hostess whose gossip column I had canceled when I became editor of
McCalls.
“You
naughty boy,” she exclaimed, “you fired me.” After my most winsome smile, she
added, “Never mind, I like you anyway.”
When
I sent Nora Ephron to interview toadlike Henry Kissinger about his publicized
bachelor dating, he told her, “Power is an aphrodisiac. Now when I bore women,
they think it’s their fault.”
So it
went in that world and sadly still seems to: flattery and foolishness rampant
in the name of elusive influence.
Notable
today is a scarcity of actual sex. Gen. Petraeus admits to it, but even those
liaisons must have been more athletic than passionate. Can you expect afterglow
from an ambitious Amazon?
Maureen
Dowd, who once dated Rush Limbaugh in the line of duty, sums up today’s scene
neatly:
“It
features toned arms, slinky outfits, a cat fight, titillating e-mails, a
military more consumed with sex than violence, a plot with more inconceivable
twists than ‘Homeland,’ and a Twitter’s-delight lexicon: an ‘embedded’ mistress
named Broadwell, a biography called ‘All In,’ an other-other woman of Middle
East ancestry who was a ‘social liaison’ to the military, a shirtless F.B.I.
agent crushing on the losing-her-shirt-to-debt Tampa socialite, a pair of
generals helping the socialite’s twin sister with a custody case, and lawyers
and crisis-management experts linked to Monica Lewinsky, John Edwards and the
ABC show ‘Scandal.’
“’This
is The National Enquirer,’ an alarmed Senator Dianne Feinstein told Wolf
Blitzer of CNN. If only it were that highbrow.”
After
an election in which the GOP paid a high price for demeaning women, it’s
pathetic to see scandals in which women are the ones degrading themselves for
influence over powerful men.
When
does it all stop so people of both genders can start acting like grownups?
Salesmen and politicians excluded, of course.
2 comments:
Realistically, how much of this is our fault as consumers of media? As the author can certainly attest, television, radio and print media are all competitive businesses that must deliver "viewers" in order to cover their bottom lines. Naturally, they are going to deliver their respective products in as appealing a package as possible in order to get as big a market-share as they can.
Regrettably, what sells to the widest variety of users seems to be the most sensationalized, violent, salacious, prurient aspects of human nature.
THIS is what we will get as consumers (and frankly as voters) until such time as we stop buying it.
What the hell are Patreaus and Allen doing they've got enough time on their hands to write thousands of emails to these women?
Post a Comment