Partial
ignorance may not be bliss, but still under the spell of multiple episodes, I
venture to join the discussion.
Is
Walter White more than a logical successor to Tony Soprano and Don Draper, anti-heroes
who fascinated us with an unexpressed dark side of our own natures from a safe
distance?
Yes,
maybe but, as White progresses from doomed good to demonic, our sympathies move
with him by increments from compassion for his original plight to condoning
behavior we deplore. His first intentional killing is justified by the victim
having a concealed shard of plate with which to attack him, but from then on,
we are off to the bloody races.
Just
as White is freed from constraint by sure knowledge of his own mortality, viewers
are liberated to make the journey with him while, for relief along the way,
being invited to scoff at brilliantly satirical scenes of PTA meetings, baby
showers and boring family dinners—-the dull flotsam and jetsam of dailyness
that fills most lives.
At
advanced age, I am fascinated by how new generations in real life are lulled
into feeling immortal and acting with a selfishness that justifies cruelty while
scoffing at empathy as sentimental weakness. Being in the know, like Walter White, trumps all other values.
The
political world reminds us daily of that. How badly do we need the fantasy
release from all of it of feeling all-powerful and enjoying evil while
reassuring ourselves it’s only entertainment after all?
Even
before cancer struck, Walter White was not going to live forever. Neither will
the politicians in today’s headlines. Nor any of us.
“Breaking
Bad” was great commercial art, larded with ads all the way, but as I continue
to enjoy it without them on Netflix, part of me is saddened while fascinated.
But true
fans need fear not. It may be gone but “Homeland” is back just in time to
mesmerize us with more of the worst of humanity.
Will
we ever see as well-done a series as either on the subject of “Breaking Good?”
No comments:
Post a Comment