Before a weekend retreat at his ranch, the Rev. George W. Bush delivered an Easter sermon yesterday, telling troops at Fort Irwin in California that what is happening in Iraq is “not a civil war, it is pure evil, and I believe we have an obligation to protect ourselves from that evil.”
After citing a suicide bombing by a car carrying children, the President took a lesson in disarming explosive devices with a remote-control robot, which he ended by “playfully steering the device straight into a row of news photographers.”
He had to leave for a $2 million fund-raiser in Brentwood so there was no time to instruct the Iraq-bound troops on how to identify “pure evil” and disarm it.
Meanwhile, in Washington, the Bush church elder, James A. Baker III, has an OpEd piece praising the President for his “new way forward” that “supports much of the approach called for by the Iraq Study Group,” which the President has totally ignored.
The former Secretary of State respectfully suggests we “beef up regional diplomacy, particularly that involving Syria and Iran” the day after Bush condemned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s talk with the Syrian President as “counterproductive.”
But former President Jimmy Carter, who has a way with words, has stepped forward to clear up all the confusion by announcing, “I’m glad she went.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Too bad goofball Carter never had a way with governance, diplomacy, statesmanship, or knowing right from wrong.
Now he's just a noisy carny barker no one listens to [except CNN cuz he's part of the local Atlanta color].
NANCY PELOSI WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE IF YOU HAD BEEN PRESIDENT ON 9/11/2001
Posted 3/31/2007 7:36:04 PM
It was early morning on Sept 11, 2001. When the President received word that America was under attack by Muslim terrorist from the middle east. Two years later after much investigating, it was time to strike back, it was time to take the battle back to the middle east were the invaders originated, the biggest murderer and supporter of terrorist was Saddam the Dictator of Iraq so Iraq was chosen if for no other reason but to show the world that you do not attack the United States of America
All the World leaders and leaders of America that cared about the USA were in agreement that Iraq should be attack and now four years later we are in the middle of a civil war that no one could have imagined. A Civil war has erupted because the leader of the Muslim world by the name of Muhammad died so suddenly that there was confusion as to who would be the next ruler of the Islamic state. To this day, the Islamic world is divided because of this issue (Shia vs. Sunni). President Pelosi now has to decide to cut and run or stay in Iraq and finish the job of bringing freedom to the 75 percent of the Iraqis that desire freedom.
THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION NOW NANCY IS WHAT WILL YOU DO NOW?
It does not matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing - by their own pronouncements - killing all of us "infidels." the peaceful Muslims are afraid to lend a hand. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die? In countries without freedom you will be killed.
So who are we at war with? There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorist Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you do not clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting. We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question: What does losing mean? It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam.
This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing really means is: We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, the terrorist want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18 years. The plan is clearly for terrorists to attack us, until we are neutered and submissive to them. If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it. The Muslim terrorist fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We'd better know it too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost!! Thank you President Pelosi and our great Soldiers, I am so proud that "DEFEAT" is one word that you and I do not use. I AM WITH YOU ALL THE WAY EVEN IF YOUR LAST NAME WERE BUSH OR KERRY OR MRS. CLINTON.
WHEN WILL THE WAR END? ANSWER: WHEN WE ARE CERTAIN THAT WE WILL NOT BE INVADED AGAIN!!
Rest of the story can be read at:
http://www.tinyurl.com/205c0
NANCY PELOSI WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE IF YOU HAD BEEN PRESIDENT ON 9/11/2001
Posted 3/31/2007 7:36:04 PM
It was early morning on Sept 11, 2001. When the President received word that America was under attack by Muslim terrorist from the middle east. Two years later after much investigating, it was time to strike back, it was time to take the battle back to the middle east were the invaders originated, the biggest murderer and supporter of terrorist was Saddam the Dictator of Iraq so Iraq was chosen if for no other reason but to show the world that you do not attack the United States of America
All the World leaders and leaders of America that cared about the USA were in agreement that Iraq should be attack and now four years later we are in the middle of a civil war that no one could have imagined. A Civil war has erupted because the leader of the Muslim world by the name of Muhammad died so suddenly that there was confusion as to who would be the next ruler of the Islamic state. To this day, the Islamic world is divided because of this issue (Shia vs. Sunni). President Pelosi now has to decide to cut and run or stay in Iraq and finish the job of bringing freedom to the 75 percent of the Iraqis that desire freedom.
THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION NOW NANCY IS WHAT WILL YOU DO NOW?
It does not matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing - by their own pronouncements - killing all of us "infidels." the peaceful Muslims are afraid to lend a hand. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die? In countries without freedom you will be killed.
So who are we at war with? There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorist Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you do not clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting. We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question: What does losing mean? It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam.
This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing really means is: We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, the terrorist want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18 years. The plan is clearly for terrorists to attack us, until we are neutered and submissive to them. If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it. The Muslim terrorist fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We'd better know it too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost!! Thank you President Pelosi and our great Soldiers, I am so proud that "DEFEAT" is one word that you and I do not use. I AM WITH YOU ALL THE WAY EVEN IF YOUR LAST NAME WERE BUSH OR KERRY OR MRS. CLINTON.
WHEN WILL THE WAR END? ANSWER: WHEN WE ARE CERTAIN THAT WE WILL NOT BE INVADED AGAIN!!
Rest of the story can be read at:
http://www.tinyurl.com/205c0
And your point regarding Bush's speech? You agree with it, you don't like it, it confuses you or what?
We fought communism for the same reason that we should fight Islam: it was and is an evil.
Threatening to nuke Mecca would be an excellent place to start as Islam, which means "that which is pacified" is far more attached to place than Chritianity. Destroy their temples and their religion will fold. What would Stalin do?
Post a Comment